Random or balanced teams: which is better?

UPDATED · 5 MIN READ

It depends on who's playing. With a group of strangers, a random draw is quick and good enough. With a group that plays together every week, teams balanced by ratings give closer games and fewer arguments, because they use what you already know about each player.

What are the ways to make teams?

Almost every group uses one of these four methods, or a mix:

  • Random draw. Odds or evens, names from a hat or a random team app.
  • Captains pick. Two captains take turns choosing.
  • Organiser decides. Whoever sets up the game makes the teams.
  • Balanced by ratings. Each player gets a score and the split keeps both teams even.

How do they compare?

The four methods, on what actually matters to a group:

Random drawCaptains pickOrganiser decidesBalanced by ratings
FairnessLowDown to luck.MediumTop players get split, the rest don't.VariesDepends on who decides.HighFour skills and positions.
SpeedSecondsNo setup.A few minutesTaking turns to pick.SlowOne person thinks it all through.FastAfter rating the squad once.
ArgumentsAbout the resultNobody decides, but the 7-2 hurts.About the orderSomeone is always picked last.About who decidesIt all falls on one person.FewPrivate ratings and a group vote.
Without knowing the playersYesNeeds no information.PartlyCaptains need to know them.NoYou need to know everyone.NoNeeds ratings.

When does a random draw make sense?

When nobody knows anybody. In a one-off game with people who haven't played together, there's no information to balance on, so chance is as good as any other method and much faster.

The trouble starts when the group repeats. With few players, three strong ones landing on the same side is quite likely, and the game is decided before anyone warms up. A draw doesn't learn: next week it can happen again.

Illustrative example: the same group, split at random and balanced by skills.

Why is balancing better for a regular group?

Because you already know how everyone plays, and balancing means using that knowledge. Rate each player on several skills (physical, defence, attack and vision) and spread the positions, and both teams come out even on everything, not just the total.

It also changes what people argue about. If ratings are private and several people's scores are averaged, nobody can say the teams were made by "the same person as always". And if the group votes between several options, the result belongs to everyone. We explain the full method in how to make balanced football teams.

Can you get the best of both?

Yes. What people miss about a draw is the variety: not always the same team against the same team. A good balanced generator gives you that too.

In Teamix, the split is deliberately not deterministic: every time you ask for teams you get a different option, and they're all balanced. Teamix suggests several, the group votes and an admin confirms. Voting needs no account, just the group's public link. More in the football team generator.

So which should I choose?

Strangers or a one-off

Random draw. Quick, no setup.

A group that plays every week

Teams balanced by ratings, with a group vote.

Balance your group's teams without doing the maths.

Create my group for free

Your next game, with fair teams.

Create my group for free

Free during early access. Works in your browser.